Answervera · test results

How we measure

A support bot that sounds confident and is wrong is worse than no bot. So every change is tested on 94 questions about the demo clinic, and the results below, failures included, come straight from the latest run on 25 October 2026.

First set

61 questions

Plain questions, written alongside the clinic's documents.

Answered correctly100%
Declined correctly100%
Answers with an unsupported claim0%

Harder set

33 questions

Slang and typos, Arabic and Turkish, arithmetic, false premises, near-miss topics and attempts to misuse the bot.

Answered correctly100%
Declined correctly100%
Answers with an unsupported claim0%
Right passage in the top 598%Search finds the passage that holds the answer.
Cost per answer$0.015Claude Opus 5.5, low effort.
Typical response time2.3 sSlowest 5%: over 3.7 s.

What each number means

Answered correctly
The documents hold the answer, and the bot gave all of it with nothing the documents don’t say. Passing a question to the team counts as a miss here.
Declined correctly
The documents don’t hold the answer, and the bot passed the question to the team instead of guessing. Answering only the part it could, while flagging the rest, also counts.
Answers with an unsupported claim
Of the answers a customer would actually see, the share with at least one statement the documents don’t back up. This is the number to keep near zero.
Who decides
A second AI model (Claude Sonnet 5.5), different from the one writing answers, reads each answer next to the clinic’s complete documents and lists anything they don’t support. Before every run it is tested on answers whose grade is known: hand-written correct answers must pass, while empty, “I don’t know”, off-topic answers and correct answers with one number changed must fail. Separately, every quote the bot cites is checked word for word against the stored documents before a customer sees it.

Read these numbers with care

Every question it got wrong (0)

None in this run. A perfect score on questions we wrote ourselves says more about the questions than about the bot; see the caveats above. The next step is a set written by people who haven’t read the documents.